FTC, Nevada Permanently Shut Down ‘Revenge Porn’ Site, MyEx

In a complaint filed in January in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada, the FTC and Nevada alleged that MyEx.com was dedicated solely to “revenge porn” and solicited intimate pictures and videos of victims, along with their personal information such as their name, address, employer and social media account information.

The site, which shut down shortly after the complaint was filed, urged visitors to “Add Your Ex” and to “Submit Pics and Stories of Your Ex.” In numerous instances, the defendants allegedly charged victims—those whose images were posted without their consent — fees from $499 to $2,800 to remove their images and information from the site.

“We are gratified that the court ordered this site shut down for good,” said Andrew Smith, Director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection, in a press release issued by the FTC. “The defendants in this case harmed individuals by publishing their intimate images, and then victimized them again by trying to extort money to take the information down.”

The federal court entered the default judgment and ordered the defendants — EMP Media, Inc. and Shad Applegate also known as Shad Cottelli — to pay more than $2 million. In addition, the court granted the FTC’s request to permanently ban the defendants from posting intimate images and personal information of others on a website without notice and consent. The order also requires the defendants to destroy all such intimate images and personal information in their possession, and prohibits them from charging individuals fees for removing such content from a website. The order further requires third parties to disable any website hosted for the defendants when those third parties have knowledge that the site posts revenge porn.

Per the FTC’s announcement, the FTC and Nevada approved a settlement with one of the other defendants in the case, Aniello Infante, who served in various corporate roles including President of EMP Media Inc. earlier this year. The settlement with Infante imposed similar conditions as the court’s latest order.

Removing from the internet non-consensual erotic imagery and sites that focus on such forms of abuse is positive news. Continuing to conflate this type of abuse with legal adult conent via semantic references to porn (per “revenge porn”), however, continues to be frustrating.